Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellants were entitled to exemption under Notification No. 6/2006 dated 01.03.2006 for supplies made against international competitive bidding, including mandatory spares, and consequently not liable to reverse CENVAT credit, pay duty, interest, or penalty.
Analysis: The issue was treated as already settled in the appellants' own case. The exemption under Notification No. 6/2006 was held applicable to goods supplied against international competitive bidding. The mandatory spares supplied along with the main equipment were also treated as covered by the same exemption, and there was no justification to require reversal of credit or payment of 10% of the value of such spares. The earlier decision having been accepted by the Revenue, the same view was followed.
Conclusion: The appellants were entitled to the exemption and were not liable for reversal of credit, duty, interest, or penalty.