Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2015 (3) TMI 399 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Bad debt deduction timing and withholding obligation on nonresident agency commissions: writeoff year and accrual nexus determine tax relief. Deduction for bad debts requires both a debit to profit and loss and a credit that obliterates the asset; a writeoff occurs only in the year the debtor's ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Bad debt deduction timing and withholding obligation on nonresident agency commissions: writeoff year and accrual nexus determine tax relief.

                          Deduction for bad debts requires both a debit to profit and loss and a credit that obliterates the asset; a writeoff occurs only in the year the debtor's account is squared off, so deduction under section 36(1)(vii) is allowable in the year the asset is extinguished. Payments to nonresidents claimed as agency commission do not attract the explanation to the withholding provision where there is no accrual of income in India; absent Indian accrual, there is no obligation to deduct tax at source and disallowance under section 40(a)(i) cannot be sustained. Both issues decided in favour of the assessee.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Denial of deduction for bad debts written off under Section 36(1)(vii) of the Income Tax Act.
                          2. Disallowance of payments to non-residents under Section 40(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act.

                          Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Denial of Deduction for Bad Debts Written Off:

                          The first issue is whether the revenue authorities were justified in denying the claim of the assessee for deduction on account of bad debts written off amounting to Rs. 1,33,28,670 under Section 36(1)(vii) of the Act. The facts reveal that the assessee, a partnership firm engaged in the export of furnishing fabrics, had claimed this deduction for an amount due from a customer in the USA. This debt was initially provided for as doubtful in the financial year 2006-07, but formal write-off approval from the bank was obtained only in 2009.

                          During the assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer (AO) disallowed the claim, stating that the debt was written off in the previous year relevant to AY 2007-08 and not in AY 2009-10. Additionally, the AO noted that the bank's approval for the write-off was dated 21.4.2009, falling within AY 2010-11, suggesting the claim should be made in that year.

                          On appeal, the CIT(Appeals) concurred with the AO's view. However, the Tribunal, upon hearing the submissions, found that in AY 2007-08, the debt was not written off in the debtor's account but was merely provided for as doubtful. The Tribunal noted that the actual write-off in the debtor's account occurred in AY 2009-10 after obtaining the necessary bank approval. The Tribunal referenced the Supreme Court decisions in TRF Ltd. v. CIT and Southern Technologies Ltd. v. JCIT, concluding that the write-off in the debtor's account in AY 2009-10 sufficed for the deduction under Section 36(1)(vii). The Tribunal directed the AO to allow the deduction for the bad debts written off.

                          2. Disallowance of Payments to Non-Residents:

                          The second issue concerns the disallowance of Rs. 25,46,796 claimed as a deduction under the head 'agency commission' under Section 40(a)(i). The assessee had made payments to various non-resident agents for procuring business, arguing that these payments were for services rendered outside India and thus not subject to tax deduction at source under Section 195.

                          The AO held that the non-residents had a business connection in India, making the commission income chargeable to tax in India, and disallowed the deduction for failure to deduct tax at source. The CIT(Appeals) upheld this view, citing Section 9(1)(i) and Explanation 2 of Section 195, asserting that the non-residents had a business connection in India.

                          The Tribunal, however, found that the non-resident agents rendered services outside India with no territorial nexus to India. Referencing the Supreme Court decision in Carborandum Co. v. CIT and CBDT Circulars, the Tribunal concluded that the non-residents' income did not accrue or arise in India, and thus, there was no obligation on the assessee to deduct tax at source. Consequently, the Tribunal directed the AO to delete the disallowance of the commission expenses paid to non-residents.

                          Conclusion:

                          The Tribunal allowed the appeal by the assessee, directing the AO to allow the deduction for bad debts written off and to delete the disallowance of commission expenses paid to non-residents.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found