Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, while determining the market value of unquoted equity shares under rule 1D of the Wealth-tax Rules, 1957, the amount shown as provision for taxation in the balance-sheet must be reduced by advance tax already paid by the company.
Analysis: Rule 1D requires the liabilities shown in the balance-sheet to be deducted, subject to the exclusions in Explanation II. Under Explanation II(ii)(e), provision for taxation is excluded only to the extent of the excess over the tax payable with reference to the book profits in accordance with the law applicable thereto. The bracketed exclusion in Explanation II(i)(a) treats advance tax paid as an asset and therefore supports the view that the provision for taxation must reflect the gross tax liability shown on the basis of book profits, without reducing it by advance tax paid. The Court distinguished the interpretation placed on the expression used in section 271(1)(a)(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and preferred the view that advance tax is not to be netted off again while applying Explanation II(ii)(e).
Conclusion: The tax payable with reference to book profits cannot be reduced by the amount of advance tax paid. The question was answered in the negative and in favour of the assessee.