Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the valuation of unquoted equity shares under section 7 read with Schedule III of the Wealth-tax Act had to follow the ratio of the jurisdictional High Court decision rendered in the context of rule 1D of the Wealth-tax Rules.
Analysis: The relevant provision in Schedule III was held to be in pari materia with rule 1D, the legislative change being only a bodily lifting of the earlier rule into the new statutory setting without any intended change in effect. On that footing, the earlier High Court ruling on valuation could not be treated as inapplicable merely because the valuation provision had been relocated into Schedule III.
Conclusion: The ratio of the earlier High Court decision continued to apply to valuation under Schedule III, and the assessee's contention was accepted.