TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>High Court Upholds Central Excise Appeal Decision, Dismisses Review Application</h1> <h3>Vinod Kumar Gupta Versus Commissioner</h3> The High Court of Punjab and Haryana upheld the decision regarding Central Excise appeals, finding no valid reason to recall the order dated 16-3-2012. ... Recall of order [2012 (5) TMI 173 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] - Levy of penalty under Rule 209 r.w.r. 26 of the Central Excise Rules,2001 directing the proprietor and partner of default companies to pay penalty – Held that:- Ground pleaded in the application is that Commissioner of Central Excise, Panchkula was wrongly impleaded as party-respondent, whereas the Commissioner of Central Excise, Chandigarh should have been made a party. None of these grounds would constitute a valid reason for recalling order dated 16-3-2012 particularly when at the time of admission of the appeal, learned counsel for the review-applicant-respondent was present - Recallind of order denied. The High Court of Punjab and Haryana reviewed a decision related to Central Excise appeals. The court found no valid reason to recall the order dated 16-3-2012. The file of the appeal was directed to be added with another related appeal. Review Application was disposed of accordingly.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
