Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether proceedings for demand and levy of interest under Section 201 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 could be initiated after an unreasonable delay in the absence of an express limitation period.
Analysis: The statutory scheme was read as requiring proceedings under Section 201 to be taken within a reasonable period, even though the provision itself does not prescribe a limitation. The Court noted that the Act fixes limitation for several important actions, including proceedings for escaped assessment and suo motu revision, and held that a similar restraint applies to action for failure to deduct tax at source. On the facts, notice was issued nearly seven years after the relevant assessment years, which was held to be beyond a reasonable time, especially where commercial arrangements and financial positions may change over time.
Conclusion: The levy under Section 201 and Section 201(1A) after such delay was held to be time-barred by the standard of reasonable period, and the questions were answered against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The appeal failed and the Tribunal's view that action under Section 201 could not be initiated after an unreasonable lapse of time was upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: Even where no express limitation is prescribed, proceedings for recovery or levy under Section 201 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 must be initiated within a reasonable period.