Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal Grants Assessee's Applications, Orders Rehearing for Correcting Mistakes</h1> <h3>M/s. Ushodaya Enterprises Private Ltd, Hyderabad Versus Addl. CIT (TDS) TDS Range-2 Hyderabad</h3> M/s. Ushodaya Enterprises Private Ltd, Hyderabad Versus Addl. CIT (TDS) TDS Range-2 Hyderabad - TMI Issues Involved:1. Time limit for completion of proceedings under Section 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Income Tax Act.2. Reasonable cause for non-deduction of tax at source on non-compete fee.3. Period for which interest under Section 201(1A) is to be charged.4. Levy of penalty under Section 271C of the Income Tax Act.5. Omission to consider the ratio of decided cases cited by the applicant.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Time Limit for Completion of Proceedings under Section 201(1) and 201(1A):The Tribunal addressed the issue of the time limit for initiation of proceedings under Section 201(1) of the Act in paragraphs 6 and 7 of its order. It was noted that the Tribunal erroneously held that the ground of appeal No.2 was allowed and mistakenly started paragraph 8 with 'Ground No.3.' The Tribunal rectified these errors by modifying the relevant paragraphs to accurately reflect the decision that the proceedings were barred by limitation. The Tribunal acknowledged the applicant's contention that the interest levied under Section 201(1A) was not within the time limit and agreed that this issue had not been adequately addressed in the original order.2. Reasonable Cause for Non-deduction of Tax at Source on Non-compete Fee:The Tribunal found that the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) was not justified in holding that the appellant did not have a reasonable cause for not deducting tax at source on the non-compete fee. The appellant argued that the recipient of the non-compete fee did not have taxable income even after considering the non-compete fee as income and therefore requested not to deduct tax. The Tribunal noted that this issue was not adequately addressed in the original order and required further consideration.3. Period for Which Interest under Section 201(1A) is to be Charged:The Tribunal addressed the issue of the period for which interest under Section 201(1A) is to be charged. It was noted that the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) had held that interest was leviable up to 13-10-2008, while the appellant argued that interest should only be levied up to 30-09-2008. The Tribunal found that this issue had not been adequately addressed in the original order and required further consideration.4. Levy of Penalty under Section 271C:The Tribunal addressed the issue of the levy of penalty under Section 271C of the Act. It was noted that the Tribunal had erroneously recorded that the requirement to make payment and the genuineness of the payment of non-compete fee had been adjudicated by the Tribunal in the assessee's own case for A.Y 2008-09. The Tribunal acknowledged that this finding was an erroneous recording of facts and required rectification. The Tribunal modified the relevant paragraph to reflect that the issue of the genuineness of the payment was directed to be verified by the Assessing Officer.5. Omission to Consider the Ratio of Decided Cases Cited by the Applicant:The Tribunal acknowledged that the applicant had relied on various judicial pronouncements to support their contention that the initiation of proceedings was beyond a reasonable period. The Tribunal agreed that the non-consideration of these case laws constituted a mistake apparent from the record. The Tribunal decided to recall the order and rectify the mistake by dealing with the case law relied upon by the applicant. The Tribunal directed that both the appeals be fixed for rehearing to provide both parties with a sufficient opportunity of hearing.Conclusion:The Tribunal allowed the miscellaneous applications filed by the assessee, acknowledging the mistakes apparent from the record in the original order. The Tribunal directed the appeals to be fixed for rehearing to address the issues raised by the assessee comprehensively. The order was pronounced in the open court on 18th April 2019.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found