Gratuity provision deduction under section 40A(7) requires strict statutory compliance and proper valuation before allowance.

Section 40A(7) permits deduction for gratuity provision only where the statutory exceptions and prescribed conditions are satisfied, including proper actuarial valuation and accurate quantification of the liability. The existing record did not show that these requirements had been fully examined by the lower authorities in line with the governing Supreme Court decisions, and the present value of the liability had not been determined with sufficient precision. The questions were therefore not finally decided on the merits and the matter was remitted to the Tribunal for reconsideration under the correct legal principles.

---

---

Issues: Whether the assessee's claim for deduction of gratuity provision under section 40A(7) could be finally answered on the existing record and whether the computation satisfied the statutory conditions for allowance.

Analysis: The dispute turned on the operation of section 40A(7), which bars deduction of gratuity provisions except to the extent permitted by the statutory exceptions. The allowance depends on compliance with the prescribed conditions, including actuarial valuation, the limits on the admissible amount, and satisfaction of the relevant factual requirements. The record showed that these matters had not been examined fully by the lower authorities in the light of the governing Supreme Court decisions, and the exact present value and proper quantification of the liability had not been determined with the necessary precision.

Conclusion: The questions referred were not answered on the merits, and the matter was sent back to the Tribunal for reconsideration in the light of the applicable legal principles.

---