Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the claim for deduction of gratuity liability required reconsideration in the light of section 40A(7)(b)(ii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, as construed earlier by the Court.
Analysis: The respondent had claimed deduction of gratuity liability on an actuarial basis. The earlier allowance had been displaced after the later circular, and the High Court had directed allowance of the deduction. The Court noted that compliance with the second and third conditions in section 40A(7)(b)(ii) had not been examined in the light of the governing interpretation and that the matter required fresh scrutiny on those conditions.
Conclusion: The matter was sent back to the High Court for fresh consideration of whether the statutory conditions for deduction of gratuity liability were satisfied.