Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2014 (10) TMI 505 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal decision on Transfer Pricing adjustments, deduction restrictions, and interest levy under tax laws The Tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeal and partly allowed the assessee's appeal for statistical purposes. The decision focused on Transfer Pricing ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tribunal decision on Transfer Pricing adjustments, deduction restrictions, and interest levy under tax laws

                          The Tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeal and partly allowed the assessee's appeal for statistical purposes. The decision focused on Transfer Pricing adjustments, directing the re-computation of arm's length price using specific comparables. It upheld the restriction of deduction under Section 10B based on director's remuneration allocation to the Export Oriented Unit. The treatment of building repair expenditure as capital was remanded for clarification, emphasizing the need for proper verification. Consequential relief was granted regarding the levy of interest under Sections 234B and 234C.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Addition on account of Transfer Pricing (TP) adjustment.
                          2. Restriction of claim for deduction under Section 10B.
                          3. Disallowance of expenditure on repairs to building as capital expenditure.
                          4. Levy of interest under Sections 234B and 234C.

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Addition on account of Transfer Pricing (TP) adjustment:
                          The primary issue in both appeals was the TP adjustment of Rs. 27,26,115 made by the Assessing Officer (AO) and partly sustained by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)]. The assessee, engaged in providing custom-engineered purification systems, had entered into various international transactions with its Associated Enterprises (AEs). The AO referred the matter to the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) to determine the arm's length price (ALP) using the Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM). The TPO found the profit margin of the assessee in the manufacturing segment to be at arm's length but made adjustments in the R&D services segment.

                          The TPO applied specific filters and selected comparables, but the assessee raised objections. The CIT(A) excluded certain comparables selected by the TPO, citing functional dissimilarities, and instead used comparables from a similar case (Tevapharm Pvt Ltd v. Addl. CIT). The CIT(A) directed the AO to recompute the ALP using an average OP/OC of 19.08%. The Tribunal upheld this decision, finding no infirmity in the CIT(A)'s order and rejecting the comparables selected by both the assessee and the TPO.

                          2. Restriction of claim for deduction under Section 10B:
                          The assessee's claim for deduction under Section 10B was restricted by allocating director's remuneration to the 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU). The AO allocated Rs. 44,47,467 of the director's remuneration to the EOU based on the turnover ratio, which was confirmed by the CIT(A). The assessee contended that the director's remuneration was exclusively for the domestic unit, but the Tribunal found no evidence to support this claim. The Tribunal upheld the allocation of director's remuneration to the EOU, affirming the CIT(A)'s decision.

                          3. Disallowance of expenditure on repairs to building as capital expenditure:
                          The AO treated the expenditure of Rs. 29,38,953 on repairs to the building as capital in nature, allowing depreciation instead. This was upheld by the CIT(A) based on a similar decision in the assessee's case for a previous assessment year. However, the Tribunal noted that the exact nature of the expenditure was not clear and remanded the issue back to the AO for fresh verification. The AO was directed to ascertain the nature of the expenditure and decide accordingly, providing the assessee an opportunity to be heard.

                          4. Levy of interest under Sections 234B and 234C:
                          The issue of levy of interest under Sections 234B and 234C was acknowledged as consequential. The Tribunal directed the AO to allow consequential relief to the assessee based on the outcomes of the other issues.

                          Conclusion:
                          The Tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeal and partly allowed the assessee's appeal for statistical purposes, providing detailed directions for each issue. The decision emphasized the importance of functional comparability in TP analysis, the necessity of allocating common expenses reasonably, and the need for clear evidence to substantiate claims regarding the nature of expenditures.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found