Input tax credit on consumables and storage framework upheld where goods were used in business and restrictive schedule did not apply.
Input tax rebate was available on consumables used in the course of business for manufacturing and job work of printed circuit boards, even though no output tax arose on the labour component, because the relevant nexus was with business use of the goods. Section 17(3) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 applied only where inputs were used for purposes other than sale, manufacturing, processing, packing or storing, resulting in partial restriction rather than a complete denial of credit. A slotted angle framework used for storing manufactured goods was treated as capital investment and not as an item covered by the restrictive Fifth Schedule entry, so the assessee's entitlement was sustained.
Issues: (i) Whether input tax deduction credit was allowable in respect of consumables used in manufacturing and job work of printed circuit boards. (ii) Whether section 17(3) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 applied to the inputs in question, and whether the slotted angle framework fell within the restrictive entry in the Fifth Schedule.
Issue (i): Whether input tax deduction credit was allowable in respect of consumables used in manufacturing and job work of printed circuit boards.
Analysis: Input tax rebate was held to be available where consumables suffered input tax and were used in the course of business, even if the activity was job work and no output tax was payable on the labour component. The earlier reasoning accepted that the nexus required was with the business use of the goods and not only with sale of the finished product, subject to the restrictions contained in the Act.
Conclusion: The claim to input tax deduction credit on consumables was upheld in favour of the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether section 17(3) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 applied to the inputs in question, and whether the slotted angle framework fell within the restrictive entry in the Fifth Schedule.
Analysis: Section 17(3) was treated as applicable where inputs were put to use for purposes other than sale, manufacturing, processing, packing or storing of goods, in addition to their use in the course of business, thereby attracting only partial rebate. On the capital goods issue, the item purchased was treated as a slotted angle framework used for keeping manufactured goods, which was regarded as capital investment and not as the item covered by the restrictive schedule entry.
Conclusion: The statutory restriction did not defeat the assessee's entitlement, and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The revision petitions failed, and the Tribunal's view allowing input tax benefit on the disputed consumables and capital goods was sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: Input tax rebate under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act is available on goods used in the course of business, including consumables used in job work, and a restrictive schedule entry must be applied according to the actual character and use of the goods purchased.
TaxTMI 
AI Drafter ✕
TaxTMI 
