<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 24 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251890</link>
    <description>Input tax rebate was available on consumables used in the course of business for manufacturing and job work of printed circuit boards, even though no output tax arose on the labour component, because the relevant nexus was with business use of the goods. Section 17(3) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 applied only where inputs were used for purposes other than sale, manufacturing, processing, packing or storing, resulting in partial restriction rather than a complete denial of credit. A slotted angle framework used for storing manufactured goods was treated as capital investment and not as an item covered by the restrictive Fifth Schedule entry, so the assessee&#039;s entitlement was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2014 07:19:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=366171" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 24 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251890</link>
      <description>Input tax rebate was available on consumables used in the course of business for manufacturing and job work of printed circuit boards, even though no output tax arose on the labour component, because the relevant nexus was with business use of the goods. Section 17(3) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 applied only where inputs were used for purposes other than sale, manufacturing, processing, packing or storing, resulting in partial restriction rather than a complete denial of credit. A slotted angle framework used for storing manufactured goods was treated as capital investment and not as an item covered by the restrictive Fifth Schedule entry, so the assessee&#039;s entitlement was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251890</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>