Appeal decision: Penalties set aside for shortages, upheld for excess Kraft paper. Commissioner upholds appeal, employee penalty set aside.

The appeal was disposed of with the penalties for shortages being set aside due to lack of evidence for clandestine removal. However, the confiscation of excess Kraft paper, redemption fine, and penalty were upheld as proper explanations or evidence were not provided for the unrecorded Kraft paper. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the appeal but set aside the penalty imposed on an employee.

---

---

Issues:
1. Confirmation of demand for shortages and imposition of penalty.
2. Confiscation of excess found Kraft paper and imposition of penalty.
3. Appeal against the penalties imposed.

Analysis:
1. The appellants, engaged in manufacturing MS ingots and Kraft paper, were subjected to stock verifications by Central Excise officers. Shortages in MS ingots and excess Kraft paper were noted. The original adjudicating authority confirmed a demand of &8377; 65,336/- for shortages and imposed penalties. The excess Kraft paper was confiscated with a redemption fine of &8377; 25,000/- and a penalty of &8377; 33,677/-. Additionally, a penalty of &8377; 15,000/- was imposed on an employee. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the appeal but set aside the penalty on the employee.

2. The appellant contested the penalties, arguing no evidence of clandestine removal existed despite not contesting the duty on the short found goods. The Tribunal had previously held that a shortage alone does not indicate clandestine removal. Referring to a case, it was noted that mere payment of duty does not imply clandestine clearance. Consequently, the penalty for shortages was set aside.

3. Concerning the excess Kraft paper, the appellants failed to provide a satisfactory explanation for the unrecorded quantity. The absence of the excess raw material in the records indicated a lack of proper accounting. The appellants did not claim that the excess goods were manufactured from duly recorded raw materials. Therefore, the confiscation of the excess goods was upheld, along with the redemption fine and penalty. The goods had been entered provisionally in the register, and the duty was paid upon clearance.

In conclusion, the appeal was disposed of with the penalties for shortages being set aside due to lack of evidence for clandestine removal. The confiscation of excess goods, redemption fine, and penalty were upheld as proper explanations or evidence were not provided for the unrecorded Kraft paper.

---