Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether credit could be denied merely because the declaration filed under Rule 57G was not detailed, when the inputs were admittedly covered by the declared chapter and the record did not show non-receipt or non-duty-paid character of the goods.
Analysis: The appellant had filed a declaration mentioning Chapter 39, and the inputs in question, namely LDPE rolls, also fell under Chapter 39. The requirement of a detailed declaration was not treated as fatal where the proper officer could be satisfied about receipt of the inputs, their duty-paid nature, and their use in manufacture. The record disclosed no allegation or evidence that the goods were not duty paid or were not received. Rule 57G(13) was relied upon to hold that credit should not be denied on a mere technical lapse in declaration.
Conclusion: Credit could not be denied on the ground of imperfect declaration, and the denial of credit was set aside in favour of the assessee.