<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 449 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248545</link>
    <description>Modvat credit under Rule 57G could not be denied solely because the declaration was not detailed, where the declared chapter covered the inputs and the record showed no non-receipt or non-duty-paid character. The inputs, being LDPE rolls, fell within Chapter 39 already mentioned in the declaration, and the proper officer could be satisfied on receipt, duty-paid nature, and use in manufacture. A mere technical lapse in the declaration was held insufficient to defeat credit, and the denial was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2014 08:12:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=357530" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 449 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248545</link>
      <description>Modvat credit under Rule 57G could not be denied solely because the declaration was not detailed, where the declared chapter covered the inputs and the record showed no non-receipt or non-duty-paid character. The inputs, being LDPE rolls, fell within Chapter 39 already mentioned in the declaration, and the proper officer could be satisfied on receipt, duty-paid nature, and use in manufacture. A mere technical lapse in the declaration was held insufficient to defeat credit, and the denial was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248545</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>