Court quashes reassessment for lack of legal authority, deems proceedings oppressive. Assessing Officer acted unreasonably.

The court held that the reassessment notice and subsequent proceedings lacked legal authority. It emphasized that the Assessing Officer acted unreasonably by persisting with the reassessment despite clear evidence provided by the petitioner. The court found the proceedings to be oppressive and harassing, ultimately quashing the reassessment notice and all further proceedings. The petition was allowed without costs awarded.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Legitimacy of the notice under Section 147/148 of the Income Tax Act.
2. Alleged non-disclosure of investment in immovable property (New Friends Colony property).
3. Alleged non-disclosure of investment in the construction of a bungalow (Green Woods property, Greater Noida).

Detailed Analysis:

1. Legitimacy of the Notice under Section 147/148:
The petitioner challenged the notice issued by the revenue on 26.03.2012 under Section 147/148 of the Income Tax Act, asserting that the notice was based on a Tax Evasion Petition driven by personal vendetta and lacked fresh or tangible admissible evidence. The court noted that the power to reopen a settled assessment must be based on objective materials, which can lead to a conclusion that income had escaped assessment due to the non-disclosure of material facts by the assessee. The court emphasized that the reasons to believe must be based on some fresh or tangible material and not merely on suspicion or unsubstantiated allegations.

2. Alleged Non-Disclosure of Investment in New Friends Colony Property:
The petitioner argued that the allegations regarding the New Friends Colony property were baseless. The property was owned by Mr. K.K. Khanna, and the petitioner was merely a lessee paying a monthly rent of Rs. 33,000. The court noted that the statement of Mr. Khanna, recorded on oath, confirmed his ownership and the petitioner's status as a tenant. The court found that the revenue's persistence in pursuing reassessment despite clear evidence rebutting the allegations was unreasonable and whimsical. The court concluded that the reassessment proceedings based on these allegations lacked legal sanction and were driven by either fear or ulterior motives.

3. Alleged Non-Disclosure of Investment in Green Woods Property, Greater Noida:
The petitioner contended that the construction of the Green Woods property was completed only in 2008, not during the relevant assessment year. The investment in the property was partly funded by the petitioner's provident fund and partly through a loan arranged by the society from HDFC. The court observed that the petitioner had provided all necessary documents and explanations, which were not refuted by the revenue. The court found that there was no material evidence to support the allegation that the petitioner had concealed income related to the construction of the property during the assessment year in question.

Conclusion:
The court held that the reassessment notice and subsequent proceedings were without legal authority. The court emphasized that the Assessing Officer acted unreasonably in persisting with the reassessment notice despite clear evidence and explanations provided by the petitioner. The reassessment proceedings were deemed to be oppressive and harassing. Consequently, the impugned reassessment notice dated 26.03.2012 and all further proceedings thereto were quashed. The petition was allowed, and no costs were awarded.

---