Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee qualified as a State Industrial Investment Corporation entitled to the benefit of section 43D of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and whether interest on the loan classified as a non-performing asset was taxable on accrual.
Analysis: The assessee was a Government company with its paid-up share capital held by the State Government and was engaged in providing long-term finance for industrial projects. On the statutory definition in Explanation (f) to section 43D, a State Industrial Investment Corporation means a Government company engaged in that business. The Tribunal also noted that the assessee had classified the loan as a non-performing asset in accordance with RBI prudential norms, and once so classified, interest was not required to be recognised as income on accrual. The earlier decision in the assessee's own case had already taken the same view.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to the benefit of section 43D, and the disputed interest could not be brought to tax on accrual.
Ratio Decidendi: A Government company engaged in providing long-term finance for industrial projects falls within the definition of a State Industrial Investment Corporation under section 43D, and interest on loans classified as non-performing assets is not taxable on accrual where statutory and prudential norms permit recognition only on realisation.