Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicants had made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit by showing that the goods were exempt from retail sale price declaration under Rule 34 and therefore not assessable under Section 4A.
Analysis: The exemption under Rule 34 applies to a package containing a commodity where the net weight is ten grams or less. The dispute concerned spit tobacco contained in pouches of 10 grams or less. Relying on the principle that such commodity is to be treated by weight and not by number, the Tribunal held that the applicant had made out a prima facie case that the goods fell within the Rule 34 exemption. On that basis, the demand under Section 4A was not required to be secured at the stay stage.
Conclusion: The applicants succeeded in obtaining waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery pending appeal.
Final Conclusion: Interim relief was granted because the goods were found, prima facie, to be covered by the packaged commodities exemption and outside the immediate reach of Section 4A valuation.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the commodity, not the outer pouch count, determines the mode of sale and the package contains ten grams or less, the Rule 34 exemption can prima facie exclude assessment under retail sale price valuation.