Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest under section 139(8) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was chargeable from a registered firm when, after giving credit for advance tax and tax deducted at source, no tax remained payable.
Analysis: The issue was covered by the Supreme Court decision in Ganesh Dass Sreeram v. ITO, which held that where advance tax covers the entire tax assessed, there is no question of charging interest for delayed filing of the return, even in the case of a registered firm. The Tribunal had followed the same principle in holding that no interest was leviable.
Conclusion: The Tribunal was correct in holding that no interest under section 139(8) was chargeable, and the reference was answered against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Interest for late filing under section 139(8) is not chargeable where the advance tax and tax deducted at source fully cover the assessed tax liability.