ITAT directs reassessment on disputed issues, favoring assessee's appeal for fair evaluation and adherence to legal standards.

The ITAT partially allowed the assessee's appeal, remanding issues such as the disallowance of hamali and loading charges for verification based on credible evidence, deletion of commission from local sales due to lack of supporting proof, verification of the difference in sundry creditors for potential double addition, and re-evaluation of the addition related to the closing stock of gunny bags for proper assessment in line with natural justice principles. The case outcome favored the assessee, directing the AO to reconsider the disputed issues with adherence to legal standards.

---

---

Issues:
1. Disallowance of 50% of hamali charges and local loading charges
2. Addition of commission from local sales
3. Difference in sundry creditors
4. Addition on account of difference in closing stock of gunny bags

Issue 1: Disallowance of 50% of hamali charges and local loading charges
The assessee, a partnership firm trading in coconut and copra, claimed expenses for hamali and loading charges. The AO disallowed 50% of the claimed amount, stating the vouchers were self-made. The assessee argued that the Acquittance Register, impounded during a survey, supported the claim. The ITAT remanded the issue to the AO to consider the Acquittance Register for verification, emphasizing the need for credible evidence to support expenditure claims.

Issue 2: Addition of commission from local sales
The AO relied on a partner's statement during a survey to add commission from local sales. However, no corroborative evidence was presented. The ITAT held that a partner's statement alone cannot justify an addition without supporting evidence. Consequently, the addition was deleted due to lack of substantiating proof.

Issue 3: Difference in sundry creditors
The contention was a reciprocal mistake in the books of account, resulting in double addition. The ITAT directed a remand to the AO to verify the claim and delete the addition if it was a mistake. The issue was allowed for statistical purposes pending verification.

Issue 4: Addition on account of difference in closing stock of gunny bags
The AO made an addition based on total sales of gunny bags without considering loose sales. The ITAT found the addition improper and directed a remand to the AO for re-evaluation based on the remand report. The addition was considered against the principles of natural justice, and the issue was remanded for further assessment.

In conclusion, the ITAT partially allowed the assessee's appeal for statistical purposes, remanding various issues back to the AO for proper consideration in accordance with the law.

---