Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether clearance of zinc hydroxide to a job worker for conversion into zinc oxide and subsequent clearance of the finished goods from the job worker's premises was permissible under Rule 4(6) of the Cenvat Credit Rules.
Analysis: The permission had been granted for several years without any finding of misuse or improper accounting. The disputed goods were used in the manufacture of zinc oxide by the job worker, and the fact that zinc hydroxide was marketable did not by itself exclude it from being treated as an intermediate product or partially processed input for the purpose of Rule 4(6). Refusal of permission on the ground that the assessee did not itself manufacture zinc oxide in its own plant was held to be unsustainable.
Conclusion: The refusal of permission was unjustified, and clearance of the finished goods from the job worker's premises was allowable under Rule 4(6).
Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the appeal was allowed, resulting in relief to the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: A goods item used in further manufacture at a job worker's premises can be treated as an intermediate product or partially processed input for Rule 4(6) purposes, and prior consistent permission without misuse should not be withdrawn merely because the item is also marketable.