<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 308 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244853</link>
    <description>Rule 4(6) of the Cenvat Credit Rules permits clearance of zinc hydroxide to a job worker for conversion into zinc oxide, with the finished goods cleared from the job worker&#039;s premises, where the goods are used in further manufacture and prior permission has been consistently granted without misuse. Mere marketability of the input does not by itself prevent it from being treated as an intermediate product or partially processed input. Refusal of permission solely because the assessee did not manufacture zinc oxide in its own plant was therefore unsustainable, and the clearance from the job worker&#039;s premises was allowable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2014 06:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348204" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 308 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244853</link>
      <description>Rule 4(6) of the Cenvat Credit Rules permits clearance of zinc hydroxide to a job worker for conversion into zinc oxide, with the finished goods cleared from the job worker&#039;s premises, where the goods are used in further manufacture and prior permission has been consistently granted without misuse. Mere marketability of the input does not by itself prevent it from being treated as an intermediate product or partially processed input. Refusal of permission solely because the assessee did not manufacture zinc oxide in its own plant was therefore unsustainable, and the clearance from the job worker&#039;s premises was allowable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244853</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>