Carry forward of loss survives later registration when the firm remains the same legal entity under tax law.

An unregistered firm that suffered a loss could carry that loss forward after it became a registered firm, because registration did not change the identity of the assessee where the constitution of the firm remained the same. Interpreting section 77(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the Punjab and Haryana High Court held that the word "firm" covers both registered and unregistered firms and that later registration, by itself, does not extinguish the benefit of carry forward. The loss was therefore allowed to be carried forward and set off in subsequent years in favour of the assessee.

---

---

Issues: Whether an unregistered firm that incurred a loss could carry forward that loss in a subsequent assessment year after it became a registered firm under section 77(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Analysis: The provision was interpreted to determine whether registration in the later year extinguished the benefit of carry forward. The decisive consideration was that the firm remained the same entity and there was no change in its constitution. On that basis, the word "firm" in section 77(1) was held to include both registered and unregistered firms, and registration by itself did not deprive the assessee of the benefit of carry forward of the loss suffered while it was unregistered.

Conclusion: The loss was rightly allowed to be carried forward and set off in the subsequent years, and the question was answered in favour of the assessee.

---