TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>High Court upholds Tribunal decision on carry forward of losses for assessee-firms under Income Tax Act</h1> The High Court of Karnataka affirmed the Tribunal's decision, allowing the carry forward of losses by an assessee-firm from the unregistered period to the ... Carry Forward And Set Off, Firm, Loss Issues: Interpretation of provisions under s. 77 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 regarding carry forward of losses by an unregistered firm when assessed as a registered firm in subsequent years.Analysis:The High Court of Karnataka was tasked with addressing two questions referred by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal regarding the carry forward of losses by an assessee-firm from the assessment year 1966-67 to 1967-68. The first question involved determining whether the loss incurred by the assessee as an unregistered firm in 1966-67 could be carried forward and added to the loss in 1967-68, to be divided among partners. The second question focused on whether the loss from 1966-67 could be set off against profits in 1967-68, despite the firm not making any profit in the latter year.The court examined the provisions of s. 77(1) of the Income Tax Act, which stipulates that losses of an unregistered firm can be carried forward or set off only against the income of the firm. The section does not restrict the carry forward of losses based on the firm's status as registered or unregistered in subsequent years. The court emphasized two conditions for carry forward: the loss must occur during the period of being assessed as an unregistered firm, and the set off is against the firm's income.The court referenced a decision by the Kerala High Court to support the interpretation that carry forward of losses from the unregistered period to the registered period is permissible under the Act. The Kerala High Court's ruling under s. 24 of the Indian I.T. Act, 1922, was deemed relevant due to the similarity in wording with s. 77(1) of the Act. The court concluded that the Tribunal's decision to allow the carry forward of losses by the assessee-firm was correct, irrespective of profit or loss in subsequent years.The court clarified that the second question and the aspect of apportionment among partners did not arise from the Tribunal's order, as there was no directive to apportion the loss or set it off against profits in the subsequent year. Therefore, the court focused solely on the first question regarding the carry forward of losses from 1966-67 to 1967-68.In conclusion, the High Court of Karnataka affirmed the Tribunal's decision, stating that the carry forward of losses by the assessee-firm from the unregistered period to the registered period was permissible under the provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court's interpretation aligned with the legislative intent of allowing such carry forwards, irrespective of the firm's status in subsequent assessment years.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
