Reasoned appellate orders must record facts and legal basis; unexplained precedent-only orders may be set aside and remanded.

An appellate order must disclose the essential facts of the dispute and the reasoning applied, particularly where the Tribunal acts as the fact-finding authority. An order that merely cites precedent without recording the factual controversy or explaining how the lower authorities dealt with the matter cannot withstand appellate scrutiny. The High Court therefore set aside the impugned Tribunal order and remanded the appeals for fresh adjudication on merits after proper factual narration and consideration of the applicable law.

---

---

Issues: Whether the Tribunal's order, which did not record the factual controversy or sufficient reasons, could be sustained and whether the matter should be remanded for fresh decision on merits.

Analysis: The order under challenge was found to be bereft of the bare facts of the case and did not explain how the dispute had been dealt with by the lower authorities. Since the Tribunal is the appellate fact-finding authority, it was expected to state the factual background and then apply the governing law so that the correctness of its conclusion could be examined in appeal. Mere citation of precedent without correlating the facts of the case was held to be insufficient for appellate scrutiny. On that basis, the Court found it necessary to set aside the Tribunal's order and remit the appeals for fresh adjudication after recording the relevant facts and considering the applicable law.

Conclusion: The Tribunal's order could not be sustained, and the matter was remanded for decision afresh on merits.

Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded, the impugned appellate order was set aside, and the dispute was sent back to the Tribunal for a fresh merits determination after proper factual and legal examination.

Ratio Decidendi: An appellate order must disclose the essential facts and reasoning necessary for judicial review; an order that omits the factual basis of the dispute and merely cites precedent is liable to be set aside and remanded.

---