Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Central Assistant Public Information Officer is authorised to respond to an application made under the Right to Information Act, 2005.
Analysis: Section 5(2) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 confines the role of a Central Assistant Public Information Officer to receiving RTI applications or appeals and forwarding them forthwith to the competent officer or authority. The obligation to furnish information or reject the request lies with the Central Public Information Officer under Section 7(1). The statutory scheme does not empower the Central Assistant Public Information Officer to issue a substantive reply on the merits of the request.
Conclusion: The Central Assistant Public Information Officer is not authorised to respond to the RTI application on merits. The issue was answered in favour of the appellant.