Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to complete waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery pending appeal.
Analysis: The dispute concerned classification of HDPE strips, and the Tribunal formed a prima facie view that the departmental circular supported classification under Chapter 39. At the same time, it noted the appellant's contention regarding quantification and CENVAT credit adjustment. Balancing these considerations, the Tribunal granted only partial relief by directing a deposit of Rs. 25,00,000 and waiving the balance pre-deposit.
Conclusion: Complete waiver was refused, but the appellant was granted partial waiver on depositing Rs. 25,00,000, and recovery of the balance was stayed during pendency of the appeals.