https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241314 A dispute on the classification of HDPE strips led the Tribunal to take a prima facie view that the departmental circular supported classification under Chapter 39. While the appellant relied on quantification issues and CENVAT credit adjustment, the Tribunal balanced those factors against the classification position and declined complete waiver of pre-deposit. It directed a deposit of Rs. 25,00,000, waived the balance pre-deposit, and stayed recovery of the remaining demand during pendency of the appeals. en-us Thu, 02 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 21 Dec 2013 08:40:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241314 A dispute on the classification of HDPE strips led the Tribunal to take a prima facie view that the departmental circular supported classification under Chapter 39. While the appellant relied on quantification issues and CENVAT credit adjustment, the Tribunal balanced those factors against the classification position and declined complete waiver of pre-deposit. It directed a deposit of Rs. 25,00,000, waived the balance pre-deposit, and stayed recovery of the remaining demand during pendency of the appeals. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 02 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241314