Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellants were entitled to waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in respect of the duty, interest and penalty demanded on waste and scrap cleared to a job worker.
Analysis: The demand arose from clearance of waste and scrap sent for conversion by a job worker, who had paid duty on the returned manufactured goods. On a prima facie view, there was no requirement to invoke the procedure under Rule 16A of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 or to deny the benefit of Notification No. 214/86-CE dated 25.3.1986 merely because duty had been paid by the job worker. The department also had not shown that the clearance value of the job-work material affected the total clearance value of the finished goods for the purposes of para 3A of Notification No. 8/2003-CE dated 1.3.2003.
Conclusion: The appellants made out a prima facie case for complete waiver of pre-deposit of duty, interest and penalty, and recovery was stayed during pendency of the appeals.