Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellants had made out a prima facie case for waiver of recovery of the confirmed demand on the basis that the Cenvat credit attributable to exempted goods had been reversed and reflected in the returns, and whether the department had a basis for alleging short reversal and invoking limitation.
Analysis: The appellants had periodically reversed the credit relatable to the exempted clearances and those reversals were reflected in the ER-1 returns. The show cause notices did not contain a clear allegation of short reversal, and the record disclosed no cogent basis for the departmental computation of alleged short payment. On the material placed, the demand appeared prima facie unsupported, and the plea of time bar also found support because the relevant facts were disclosed in the returns.
Conclusion: The appellants were held entitled to complete waiver of recovery pending the appeal, and stay was granted against recovery of the confirmed dues.