Tribunal allows deduction under Section 80IB for company in backward area, directs review of disallowance.

The Tribunal upheld the assessee's entitlement to a deduction under Section 80IB of the Income Tax Act, as the company met the conditions specified in the Act and was located in an industrially backward state. The Tribunal also directed the Assessing Officer to reconsider the disallowance made under Section 40(a)(ia) in subsequent years if TDS had been deducted and remitted to the government account. The order resulted in a partial allowance of the Revenue's appeal, with the decision pronounced on January 30, 2013.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Entitlement to deduction under Section 80IB of the Income Tax Act.
2. Deletion of disallowance made under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Entitlement to Deduction under Section 80IB of the Income Tax Act:

The primary issue concerns whether the assessee, a company engaged in the manufacture and sale of ophthalmic instruments and equipment, is entitled to a deduction under Section 80IB of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Year 2009-10. The assessee filed its return declaring a total income of Rs. 13,25,78,530 after claiming a deduction of Rs. 5,68,19,369 under Section 80IB. The Assessing Officer (AO) denied this deduction on the grounds that the assessee's products are listed in the Eleventh Schedule of the Act, which disqualifies them from the deduction.

On appeal, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (CIT(A)) disagreed with the AO, stating that the assessee is entitled to the deduction under Section 80IB due to the exceptions provided in the proviso to clause (iii) of sub-section (2) of Section 80IB. These exceptions include small-scale industrial undertakings (SSI) and industrial undertakings located in industrially backward areas.

The CIT(A) held that the assessee's unit is located in Pondicherry, an industrially backward state as per the Eighth Schedule, and thus qualifies for the deduction even if the manufactured items are listed in the Eleventh Schedule. The CIT(A) further noted that the assessee's unit is registered as an SSI, which also qualifies it for the deduction under the proviso to clause (iii).

The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, confirming that the assessee is entitled to the deduction under Section 80IB since it meets the conditions specified in sub-section (2) and is located in an industrially backward state. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's grounds on this issue, as the Revenue could not provide any supporting material to rebut the CIT(A)'s findings.

2. Deletion of Disallowance Made under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act:

The second issue concerns the disallowance made by the AO under Section 40(a)(ia) on the grounds that the assessee had not deducted TDS on certain payments. The Counsel for the Assessee submitted that TDS had been deducted and remitted to the government account in subsequent assessment years. The Counsel requested a direction for the AO to consider these payments as allowable expenses in the subsequent years.

The Tribunal agreed with the Counsel's submission and allowed the Revenue's grounds on this issue. The Tribunal directed the AO to verify and consider the payments made to various parties as allowable expenses in the subsequent years, provided the TDS had been deducted and remitted to the government account.

Conclusion:

The Tribunal's order resulted in a partial allowance of the Revenue's appeal. The deduction under Section 80IB was upheld in favor of the assessee, while the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) was directed to be reconsidered in subsequent years. The order was pronounced on January 30, 2013.

---