Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether pre-deposit of service tax and penalties was required to be made, and whether the activity of removing fly ash from silos and hydrobins prima facie attracted liability as a cleaning service.
Analysis: The applicant claimed that it was only evacuating ash and was not engaged in cleaning activity. The Tribunal noted that on similar facts it had already granted stay and observed that removal of fly ash from the ash pond to another area did not prima facie fall within cleaning service. On that basis, deposit of service tax and penalties was not insisted upon during pendency of the appeal.
Outcome: Pre-deposit of the adjudged dues was waived and recovery was stayed during pendency of the appeal.