Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the lease premium paid for acquisition of leasehold rights and additional FSI was "rent" within the meaning of section 194-I of the Income-tax Act, 1961, so as to require deduction of tax at source.
Analysis: The payment was found to be a price paid for obtaining the lease and for acquiring leasehold rights, not a periodic payment made under an existing lease. It was also linked with acquisition of additional built-up area and FSI benefits, which were treated as consideration for transfer of property rights rather than consideration for use of land as rent. On the facts, the payment was held to be in the nature of capital expenditure and outside the scope of "rent" under section 194-I.
Conclusion: The assessee was not liable to deduct tax at source under section 194-I on the lease premium payment.