TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal clarifies treatment of expenses and indexation date for LTCG calculations</h1> <h3>Viveck Mathreja Versus ITO, 21 (2) (4), Mumbai</h3> Viveck Mathreja Versus ITO, 21 (2) (4), Mumbai - TMI Issues Involved:1. Disallowance of certain expenditure as not capital/cost of improvement2. Correct date of indexation for computing LTCGAnalysis:Issue 1: Disallowance of Certain ExpenditureThe appellant, in this case, sold an immovable property and offered Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG) for tax after deducting various costs. The Assessing Officer (AO) disallowed certain expenses like lease rent capitalization, water proofing charges, and property tax. The appellant argued that these expenses should be considered as capital in nature and included in the cost of purchase. The Tribunal noted that lease rental payments for a leasehold property are capital expenditure. Water proofing charges, done after construction, add value to the asset and should be included in the cost of improvement. However, vacant land tax and property tax are not capital in nature and should not be included in the cost of acquisition. Therefore, the ground was partly allowed, and the disallowance of certain expenses was overturned.Issue 2: Correct Date of IndexationThe appellant contested the correct date for indexation of land cost for computing LTCG. The AO had chosen a later date for indexation, resulting in an addition to the LTCG. The appellant argued that indexation should be allowed from the first date when the land was held. The Tribunal analyzed the legal obligations related to the acquisition of the property and concluded that the benefit of indexation should be allowed from the date when the appellant first acquired the right in the property, which was when the payment of the entire purchase consideration was made. Therefore, the Tribunal set aside the findings of the CIT(A) and allowed the indexation benefit from the correct date. As a result, the appeal on this issue was allowed.In conclusion, the Tribunal partially allowed the appeal of the assessee by overturning the disallowance of certain expenses as capital in nature and correcting the date for indexation of land cost for computing LTCG. The judgment provides clarity on the treatment of expenses and the correct date for indexation in such cases.
TaxTMI 