SSI exemption and pre-deposit waiver: strong prima facie case and financial hardship justified interim relief pending appeal

SSI exemption disputes involving alleged use of another person's brand name and extended limitation may justify waiver of pre-deposit where the assessee shows a strong prima facie case and financial hardship. On the stay application, the Tribunal considered the competing claims over brand ownership and family use, the civil court compromise order, the authorities cited by both sides, and balance-sheet material supporting weak financial condition. It concluded that interim relief was warranted pending final disposal of the appeals, and pre-deposit was waived with stay petitions allowed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appellants made out a strong prima facie case and financial hardship warranting waiver of pre-deposit pending final disposal of the appeal.

Analysis: The dispute arose from denial of SSI exemption on the allegation that the goods bore a brand name of another person and from the Revenue's invocation of extended limitation. For the limited purpose of the stay application, the Tribunal noted the competing claims regarding ownership and family use of the brand name, the civil court compromise order, and the authorities relied upon on both sides. It also considered the plea of weak financial condition supported by balance-sheet material. On that basis, the Tribunal found that the appellants had shown a strong prima facie case both on facts and in law for interim relief.

Conclusion: Pre-deposit was waived and all stay petitions were allowed pending final decision of the appeals.

---