Execution court must first examine prior satisfaction objection before releasing attached decree amount.

The executing court was required to consider the judgment debtor's objection that the decretal amount had already been fully paid and that full satisfaction had been recorded in execution before any attached amount was disbursed. The court directed that this objection be examined first, and that orders be passed on it before release of the attached amount. The ruling underscores that an execution court should address a plea of prior satisfaction of the decree before permitting disbursement under attachment.

---

---

Issues: Whether the executing court was required to consider the judgment debtor's objection that the decretal amount had already been fully paid before disbursement of the attached amount.

Analysis: The objection raised that no further amount remained due to the decree holder and that full satisfaction had already been recorded in execution. The direction sought was that the executing court examine this objection before releasing the amount attached pursuant to the impugned orders.

Outcome: The Original Petition was disposed of with a direction to the executing court to consider the objection and pass orders on it before disbursement of the attached amount.

---