https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234371 The executing court was required to consider the judgment debtor's objection that the decretal amount had already been fully paid and that full satisfaction had been recorded in execution before any attached amount was disbursed. The court directed that this objection be examined first, and that orders be passed on it before release of the attached amount. The ruling underscores that an execution court should address a plea of prior satisfaction of the decree before permitting disbursement under attachment. en-us Wed, 17 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 08 Jun 2013 11:18:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234371 The executing court was required to consider the judgment debtor's objection that the decretal amount had already been fully paid and that full satisfaction had been recorded in execution before any attached amount was disbursed. The court directed that this objection be examined first, and that orders be passed on it before release of the attached amount. The ruling underscores that an execution court should address a plea of prior satisfaction of the decree before permitting disbursement under attachment. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 17 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234371