High Court affirms Tribunal decision on rental income exemption under Income-tax Act

The High Court affirmed the Tribunal's decision, ruling that the rental income from letting out Vani Mahal by Sri Thyaga Brahma Gana Sabha qualifies for exemption under section 11 read with section 2(15) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court held that the Sabha's activities for general public utility, such as musical events and education in fine arts, were charitable in nature, and any income derived from letting out the hall was incidental and not for profit. The court awarded costs to the assessee with counsel's fee set at Rs. 500.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Whether the income from letting out of Vani Mahal falls within the objects of general public utility u/s 2(15) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
2. Whether the letting out of Vani Mahal constitutes an activity.
3. Whether the letting out of Vani Mahal is an activity for profit.

Summary:

Issue 1: General Public Utility
The Tribunal held that the objects of the assessee, Sri Thyaga Brahma Gana Sabha, were for general public utility within the meaning of section 2(15) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Sabha's activities, including holding musical entertainments, dramas, dance recitals, and running a music and dance school, were deemed to promote education and fine arts, thus falling within the scope of "advancement of objects of general public utility."

Issue 2: Activity
The Tribunal concluded that the letting out of Vani Mahal did not amount to an activity within the meaning of section 2(15) of the Act. The hall was let out only when not required by the Sabha, and the income derived from such letting was incidental to the Sabha's primary objective of promoting fine arts and education.

Issue 3: Activity for Profit
Even assuming that letting out of the hall was an activity, the Tribunal held that it was not an activity for profit. The Sabha's primary object was to impart education in fine arts, and the letting out of the hall was incidental. The Tribunal noted that the income from letting out the hall was meager and the Sabha often operated at a loss. The Supreme Court's decision in CIT v. Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation [1986] 159 ITR 1 was cited, emphasizing that if the predominant object is charitable, incidental profit does not alter its charitable nature.

Conclusion:
The High Court affirmed the Tribunal's decision, holding that the assessee's rental income from letting out Vani Mahal is exempt u/s 11 read with section 2(15) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court answered all the questions in the affirmative and against the Revenue, awarding costs to the assessee with counsel's fee fixed at Rs. 500.

---