Application of mind is essential in summoning orders under the Income-tax Act; bare issuance of warrants was quashed.

A summoning order in an Income-tax Act complaint was quashed because the trial court had not shown due application of mind to the complaint, its averments, or the supporting facts and circumstances. A bare direction to register the complaint and issue bailable warrants was held insufficient, and exemption of the complainant's personal appearance did not amount to consideration of the merits. The trial court was directed to pass a fresh order in accordance with law after proper application of mind.

---

---

Issues: Whether the order summoning the accused in a complaint under the Income-tax Act, 1961 was liable to be quashed for want of application of mind by the trial court.

Analysis: The summoning order merely directed registration of the complaint and issuance of bailable warrants, without showing that the trial court had considered the averments in the complaint or the facts and circumstances of the case. Exemption of the complainant's personal appearance did not amount to application of mind to the merits of the complaint or the material supporting the prosecution.

Conclusion: The summoning order was quashed and the trial court was directed to pass a fresh order in accordance with law after due application of mind.

---