Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an assessment order passed before consideration of objections, though served only later, could be sustained under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act.
Analysis: The notice under section 25(1) called for objections within seven days. The assessee sought additional time and filed objections before the assessment order was despatched and served, though the order bore an earlier date. The governing principle applied was that an assessment order becomes effective only when it is issued or communicated so that it is beyond the control of the assessing authority. Since the objections were available before the order became operative, they had to be considered before completing the assessment.
Conclusion: The assessment order was unsustainable for failure to consider the objections and was quashed.
Final Conclusion: Fresh assessment was directed after considering the objections and granting an opportunity of hearing.
Ratio Decidendi: An assessment order is not effective until it is issued or communicated, and if objections are filed before the order attains that finality, the assessing authority must consider them before finalising the assessment.