Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2013 (3) TMI 496

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... RESPONDENT: BY SR. GOVT. PLEADER SMT. SOBHA ANNAMMA EAPPEN   JUDGMENT Heard the learned senior counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondent.   2. Petitioner is a public limited Company engaged in the business of purchase and sale of plastic furniture. It is a dealer registered under the KVAT Act. In this writ petition, Ext.P4 a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... office of the respondent on 3.1.2012 and was served on the petitioner on 7.1.2012.   4. In this writ petition, what is contended by the petitioner is that it had sought time for filing objections by Ext.P2 and Ext.P3, objection was filed on 9.12.2011 and that despite having received Ext.P3 before despatching Ext.P4, the respondent did not consider the objections. 5. Although the learne....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....mentioned earlier, the assessee had filed its returns much before the assessment order was served on it. This Court had occasion to consider the validity of such assessment order in a series of decisions. It has been uniformly held that the assessment order becomes effective only when it is issued from the office of the assessing authority. In T.C.C No.6 of 1981, a Division Bench of this Court has....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed on subsequent information, thinking or change of opinion. To make the order complete and effective, it should be issued, so as to be beyond the control of the authority concerned, foir any possible change or modification therein. By applying the above principle it has to be taken that before the assessment order has become effective by issuing the same by the office of the assessing authority, ....