Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment orders passed pursuant to the notices issued under the KVAT Act were liable to be quashed for having been made without considering the dealer's objections and without affording a proper opportunity of hearing.
Analysis: The notices were issued for the relevant assessment years and the dealer had sought permission to file revised returns as well as time to file objections. The materials showed that the objections were not taken into account before the impugned orders were passed, and the request for time was also not communicated as rejected. In these circumstances, the matter required reconsideration after giving the dealer an effective opportunity to be heard.
Conclusion: The impugned orders were quashed and the respondent was directed to pass fresh orders after considering the objections and after affording an opportunity of hearing.