2013 (2) TMI 412

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....SMT. SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN. JUDGMENT   Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondent. 2. The petitioner is a dealer under the KVAT Act. They were issued Exts.P1 to P4 notices under Sections 25 and 67 of the Act concerning the assessment years 2009-10 and 2010-11. The petitioner thereupon filed replies requesting that th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r request for filing revised return is rejected. To Ext.P6, respondent did not give any reply to the petitioner. 3. Subsequently, Ext.P8 order was passed on 26/11/2012 rejecting the petitioners' request for filing revised returns and that order was served on the petitioner only on 13/12/2012. It is stated that the petitioner has filed an appeal against Ext.P8 which is pending consideration of t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r rejecting Ext.P6 request for time was communicated to the petitioner also. In such circumstances, I am inclined to think that respondent should re-consider the matter after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. 5. Therefore, I dispose of this writ petition quashing Exts.P11 to P14 and direct the respondent to pass fresh orders on Exts.P1 to P4, taking into account Exts.P9 and....