Court quashes tax notice post amalgamation, transferor not liable. Appointed date crucial.

The court quashed the notice issued under section 142(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2010-11 post amalgamation. The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, holding that the transferor company was no longer liable for assessment proceedings following the amalgamation. The court emphasized that the appointed date for the scheme was 1.4.2009, as approved by the High Court, and found the notice invalid based on legal principles established by the Supreme Court regarding the effective date of amalgamation specified in the scheme.

---

---

Issues:
Challenge to notice under section 142(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for assessment year 2010-11 post amalgamation.

Analysis:
The petitioner challenged a notice issued by the respondent under section 142(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the assessment year 2010-11. The notice was directed to a company that was part of an amalgamation scheme with another company. The High Court had sanctioned the amalgamation scheme without modifying the appointed date, which was set as 1.4.2009. The petitioner argued that since the transferor company no longer existed post-amalgamation, it should not be subject to assessment proceedings. The petitioner relied on a Supreme Court decision which emphasized that the date of amalgamation/transfer specified in the scheme should be considered as the effective date, unless modified by the court. The court agreed with the petitioner's argument, stating that the transferor company was no longer liable for assessment for the year 2010-11 post-amalgamation. The court found the notice invalid and quashed it, ruling in favor of the petitioner.

In conclusion, the court allowed the petition, quashed the impugned notice, and made the rule absolute. The court held that the transferor company was no longer subject to assessment proceedings for the assessment year 2010-11 following the amalgamation. The court emphasized that the appointed date for the scheme was 1.4.2009, as approved by the High Court, and the notice issued by the respondent was deemed invalid. The court's decision was based on legal principles established by the Supreme Court regarding the effective date of amalgamation specified in the scheme.

---