TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appellate Tribunal Invalidates Notice to Non-existing Company under Section 148</h1> <h3>M/s Mehta Air Travels Pvt. Ltd. Versus The Income Tax Officer, Ward 2 (1) (4) Ahmedabad</h3> M/s Mehta Air Travels Pvt. Ltd. Versus The Income Tax Officer, Ward 2 (1) (4) Ahmedabad - TMI Issues:1. Validity of notice u/s. 148 on a non-existing company2. Validity of assessment order passed without serving notice u/s. 143(2)3. Consideration of judicial support by CIT(A)4. Existence of company during assessment yearAnalysis:Issue 1:The appeal challenges the validity of the notice u/s. 148 issued to a company that was struck off as defunct by the Registrar of Companies. The appellant argues that the company was non-existent at the time of notice issuance, rendering the proceedings invalid. The CIT(A) confirmed the notice's issuance and service, leading to the appeal.Issue 2:The appellant contests the assessment order's validity, highlighting the absence of service of notice u/s. 143(2). The Assessing Officer issued the notice but did not provide proof of service, raising concerns about the assessment's legality. The CIT(A) failed to address this ground, leading to a challenge on the order's validity.Issue 3:The appellant raised objections regarding the CIT(A)'s failure to consider judicial support submitted during the appeal. Various case laws were cited to support the appellant's contentions, but the CIT(A) dismissed their applicability due to factual differences. This issue questions the adequacy of judicial consideration in the appeal process.Issue 4:The core contention revolves around the company's existence during the assessment year. The appellant argued that the company was struck off from the Registrar of Companies, indicating its non-existence. This fact was crucial in determining the validity of the assessment order and the proceedings conducted by the Assessing Officer. The appellant's argument was supported by documentary evidence, leading to the reversal of the assessment order.In the final judgment, the Appellate Tribunal held that the company, being struck off from the Registrar of Companies, was non-existent during the assessment year. This crucial fact invalidated the assessment order, leading to its annulment. The Tribunal set aside the assessment order for the Assessment Year 2008-09, ruling in favor of the appellant.
TaxTMI 