Tribunal quashes Income Tax order due to procedural issues, emphasizing fairness and right to be heard.

The Tribunal quashed the order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) under Section 263, deeming it null and void due to the dissolution of the assessee company and lack of procedural fairness. The appeal was allowed, emphasizing the invalidity of the assessment order on a non-existing entity. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of adherence to procedural fairness and the right to be heard, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee on 26/02/2018.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Validity of the order passed under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
2. Non-service of show cause notice and opportunity of being heard.
3. Dissolution of the assessee company and its implications on the assessment order.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Validity of the Order Passed Under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961:
The assessee challenged the validity of the order passed under Section 263 by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT), arguing that the original assessment order itself was null and void as it was passed on a non-existing entity. The assessee company was dissolved on 18/03/2011, and therefore, any assessment or revision order passed thereafter is legally untenable. The Tribunal relied on various judicial pronouncements, including the Delhi High Court's decision in CIT vs Escorts Farms Pvt Ltd and the ITAT's decision in Krishna Kumar Saraf vs CIT, which held that an order passed on a non-existing entity is null and void. Consequently, the PCIT could not assume jurisdiction to revise a non est order, making the impugned order under Section 263 a nullity in the eyes of law.

2. Non-service of Show Cause Notice and Opportunity of Being Heard:
The assessee contended that the revision order under Section 263 was passed without serving a show cause notice and without providing a sufficient opportunity of being heard. The Tribunal noted that although the PCIT claimed to have issued a notice under Section 263, the assessee never received it due to the company's dissolution. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of procedural fairness and the right to be heard, which were not adhered to in this case.

3. Dissolution of the Assessee Company and Its Implications on the Assessment Order:
The Tribunal examined the fact that the assessee company was dissolved by the Registrar of Companies on 18/03/2011, and thus, it ceased to exist. The Tribunal referred to several judicial precedents, including the Jurisdictional High Court's decision in Jitendra Chandaralal Navlani & Anr Vs. UOI, which held that no reassessment proceedings can be initiated against a non-existing company. The ITAT Ahmedabad Bench in Milestone Tradelink Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO also supported this view. The Tribunal concluded that since the company was not in existence on the date of the order passed under Section 143(3) read with Section 147, the order itself was null and void. Therefore, the PCIT's action of invoking Section 263 was without jurisdiction and contrary to the provisions of law.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal quashed the order passed by the PCIT under Section 263, holding it to be null and void due to the dissolution of the assessee company and the lack of procedural fairness. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the order was pronounced in the open court on 26/02/2018.

---