Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the transfer order was liable to be quashed as a punitive transfer made on mala fide considerations without disciplinary proceedings.
Analysis: The applicants were transferred before completion of the minimum tenure prescribed for the station. The material on record showed that the transfer was preceded by allegations of misconduct and by correspondence recommending transfer, but no departmental proceeding or vigilance inquiry was initiated. The record also indicated that the transfer followed direct intervention by a superior officer in a dispute involving installation of machinery, and the impugned order was passed in the guise of administrative exigency despite the allegations being treated as a basis for punitive action. An order of transfer ordinarily falls within administrative discretion, but it becomes vulnerable where it is shown to be mala fide or imposed in lieu of punishment.
Conclusion: The transfer order was held to be punitive and mala fide, and was quashed.
Final Conclusion: The applicants were entitled to continue at the original posting, and the respondents were directed to permit them to rejoin at Bhopal Zone.
Ratio Decidendi: A transfer order passed on allegations of misconduct, without instituting disciplinary or vigilance proceedings, and used as a substitute for punishment, is liable to be set aside if mala fides are established.