Remand for fresh adjudication on calcined bauxite classification and notification entitlement after additional grounds were admitted.

The Tribunal permitted additional legal grounds to be raised and treated them as part of the appeal. Finding that the entitlement to Notification No. 6/2002-CE and the classification question whether calcined bauxite could be treated as ore or concentrate required reconsideration by the adjudicating authority, and noting both sides' agreement, it set aside the impugned order. The matter was remitted for fresh adjudication after observing principles of natural justice, with all issues left open. The dispute was therefore not decided on merits and returned for reconsideration at the original adjudicatory stage.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appeals were liable to be remanded for fresh consideration of the entitlement to the benefit of Notification No. 6/2002-CE and the effect of the additional legal grounds raised before the Tribunal.

Analysis: The Tribunal allowed the miscellaneous application for raising additional legal grounds and treated them as part of the appeal. As the question whether calcined bauxite could be treated as ore or concentrate required reconsideration by the adjudicating authority, and both sides agreed that the matter should go back for fresh adjudication, the impugned order was set aside. The matter was remitted for reconsideration after following the principles of natural justice, with all issues kept open.

Conclusion: The appeals were allowed by way of remand and the assessee obtained a fresh adjudication on the disputed issue.

Final Conclusion: The dispute was not decided on merits and was sent back to the adjudicating authority for a fresh decision.

---