https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219924 The Tribunal permitted additional legal grounds to be raised and treated them as part of the appeal. Finding that the entitlement to Notification No. 6/2002-CE and the classification question whether calcined bauxite could be treated as ore or concentrate required reconsideration by the adjudicating authority, and noting both sides' agreement, it set aside the impugned order. The matter was remitted for fresh adjudication after observing principles of natural justice, with all issues left open. The dispute was therefore not decided on merits and returned for reconsideration at the original adjudicatory stage. en-us Tue, 18 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 Jan 2013 15:08:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219924 The Tribunal permitted additional legal grounds to be raised and treated them as part of the appeal. Finding that the entitlement to Notification No. 6/2002-CE and the classification question whether calcined bauxite could be treated as ore or concentrate required reconsideration by the adjudicating authority, and noting both sides' agreement, it set aside the impugned order. The matter was remitted for fresh adjudication after observing principles of natural justice, with all issues left open. The dispute was therefore not decided on merits and returned for reconsideration at the original adjudicatory stage. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 18 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219924