ITAT ruling: Expenses to Delhi Stock Exchange allowed, parking charges disallowed under IT Act

The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, deeming expenses paid to Delhi Stock Exchange as allowable for the relevant assessment year. However, the disallowance of parking charges paid to Bharat Hotels Ltd. was upheld under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act as no TDS was deducted, and the payment was considered a contractual obligation falling under section 194C.

---

---

Issues:
1. Disallowance of expenses paid to Delhi Stock Exchange.
2. Disallowance of parking charges paid to Bharat Hotels Ltd.

Issue 1 - Disallowance of expenses paid to Delhi Stock Exchange:
The assessee made a payment to the Delhi Stock Exchange, with the Assessing Officer allowing only a portion and disallowing the rest as not related to the relevant assessment year. The CIT (A) upheld the disallowance, stating that the amount indeed pertained to earlier years based on documentary evidence provided by the appellant. The appellant argued that the expenses were allowable as they crystallized in the current year and were for business purposes. The ITAT held that certain expenses, such as fees for revocation of suspension of trading and condonation fees, were allowable as they arose and crystallized during the year under consideration. However, listing fees for prior years were also allowed as they were not demanded earlier and crystallized during the current year. Therefore, the total expenditure of Rs.50,000 was deemed allowable for the relevant assessment year.

Issue 2 - Disallowance of parking charges paid to Bharat Hotels Ltd:
The revenue disallowed Rs.60,000 paid to Bharat Hotels Ltd. as parking charges under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, stating it should have been subject to TDS under section 194C. The assessee contended that the payment was deemed rent for parking space, falling under section 194I, and not subject to TDS as the threshold limit was not met. The ITAT noted that there was no evidence showing the parking space was earmarked for the assessee, and the invoice from Bharat Hotels did not specify earmarking. As such, the ITAT held that the provisions of section 194I did not apply, and the payment was considered a contractual obligation falling under section 194C. Since no TDS was deducted, section 40(a)(ia) was applicable, and the disallowance was upheld. The ITAT dismissed the appeal on this ground.

In conclusion, the ITAT partially allowed the appeal, allowing the expenses paid to the Delhi Stock Exchange but upholding the disallowance of parking charges paid to Bharat Hotels Ltd.

---